Figures › Maternity, paternity, adoption and other family pay
Statutory Parental Bereavement Pay: weeks payable
How many weeks of Statutory Parental Bereavement Pay a parent can claim for each child.
2weeks
Corroborated Statutory Instrument
Great Britain
in force since 2020-04-06
Checked against its sources: statute verified 2026-09-21·guidance verified 2026-09-21
Scope: Two weeks per child, payable to each parent who qualifies. The rate is a separate figure. The matching two weeks of Parental Bereavement LEAVE is a different entitlement in different Regulations; GOV.UK's combined guide states the two weeks as leave, and that is the sentence registered as corroboration here, since the page states no separate duration for pay.
Current sources
History
| Value | From | To | Status | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2020-04-06 | — | Corroborated |
|
Receipt
Everything above is reproducible and independently checkable — no trust in this site required (how verification works).
- Figure ID
employment.spbp.weeks- Name in the API
- Statutory Parental Bereavement Pay: weeks
- Record fields (source type · unit · jurisdiction · status)
- si·weeks·GB·corroborated
- Record hash (canonical JSON, SHA-256)
sha256:4f07e8d6cae42524638daa7f2e34d73a89b8408700b399410e0a3d7fc24d6335- Source snapshots (SHA-256)
- Legislation:
sha256:c985f74bc407d808d498cbca6a0975674eb7a3e93389dc4c6b45067c63254682 - Official guidance:
sha256:28ae98f36ab0c12c10846ad08ec3682f3e9e31c55c8ff0e85c27fd2cc59d3a72 - Listed in the signed manifest
- release 3.0.0 manifest
·
record_hashes["employment.spbp.weeks"] - Machine-readable record
- /v1/figures/employment.spbp.weeks · current only: /v1/figures/employment.spbp.weeks/current
Compiler's notes
An SI carry (ADR-0014), and a HOST-STATES one: no textual amendment touches regulation 5, so the 2020 Regulations state the value by their own words and their as-made text is its own frozen witness. That is what the probe checks — ANY touching F-note would mean the host's own made text is not what states today's value, and the record would have to name the amender instead.