Maximum statutory redundancy pay

Not a figure any document states, which is why it is a derivation and not a carry — s.162 gives a calculation and prints no sum. NO LITERAL REMAINS IN THE FORMULA, and that is the change this row records. The old spelling was 20 * 1.5 * Maximum week's pay (redundancy and unfair dismissal), written at Gate 0 when neither digit had a record to point at; both now do, so the 20 reads Redundancy pay: maximum years of service counted (s.162(3), “twenty years”) and the 1.5 reads Redundancy pay: weeks per year of service, age 41 and over (s.162(2)(a), “one and a half weeks' pay”), each through @numeric, the selector the DSL reads a scalar count or ratio with. The value is unchanged at £22,530.00 and Gate 2 recomputes it from the same three numbers. This is the opposite case to Statutory pay recovery: small employers (total), whose 100 must stay a literal because regulation 4(b)(i) states its proportion in words and no record can hold it: here the statute states both multipliers outright, so a literal would have been a second copy of a figure the corpus already carries. The record's NAME still says “30 weeks”, which is 20 × 1.5 and is how the guidance and the profession say it; the name is a label, not the formula. The declared invariant on Maximum week's pay (redundancy and unfair dismissal) (“max_payment == 20 * 1.5 * this”) still spells its multipliers as digits — it is a Gate 0 leftover on a record this script does not own, and FM-7 already recomputes the same identity every build, so it is a duplicate to retire rather than a second place to edit.